Legal Opinion

Rancourt v. Verba

Supreme Court of Vermont

Decided March 15, 1996No. 95-029PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Allen, CJ.

Defendants sold plaintiffs a parcel of land in North Hero, which the parties subsequently learned was unsuitable for lakeshore development. Plaintiffs sued to rescind, but the court allowed defendants to elect rescission or pay damages to plaintiffs for the diminished value of the property. It awarded plaintiffs attorney’s fees, but denied plaintiffs’ claim for prejudgment interest and consequential damages. Both parties appealed. We reverse.

In November 1989, defendants sold a ten-acre, lakeshore lot in North Hero to plaintiffs for $115,000. Defendants knew that plaintiffs intended…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Renner v. KehlArizona Supreme Court · 1986
  2. Enequist v. BemisSupreme Court of Vermont · 1947
  3. Moonves v. HillSupreme Court of Vermont · 1976
  4. Paradise Restaurant, Inc. v. Somerset Enterprises, Inc.Supreme Court of Vermont · 1995
  5. Thieme v. WorstIdaho Court of Appeals · 1987

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Will v. Mill Condominium Owners' Ass'nSupreme Court of Vermont · 2004
  2. Arnell v. Salt Lake County Board of AdjustmentCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2005
  3. Will v. MILL CONDOMINIUM OWNERS'ASS'NSupreme Court of Vermont · 2004
  4. von Trapp CU PermitVermont Superior Court · 2014

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API