Legal Opinion
Thieme v. Worst
Idaho Court of Appeals
Decided October 29, 1987No. 16054PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
SUBSTITUTE OPINION
Upon denial of petition for rehearing.
This opinion supersedes the Court’s prior opinion issued June 1, 1987.
SWANSTROM, Judge.
The buyers in a land sale contract, Norris and Katherine Thieme, brought this action for rescission of the contract, for damages and for attorney fees. They sued the sellers, Richard and Rebecca Worst, and a real estate broker, John Tolk, alleging misrepresentation of the availability of irrigation water. The Worsts and the broker cross-claimed against each other. The district court, finding a mutual mistake of fact regarding the delivery of water to…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Minich v. Gem State Developers, Inc.Idaho Supreme Court · 1979
- Sorenson v. AdamsIdaho Supreme Court · 1977
- Paloukos v. Intermountain Chevrolet Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1978
- Fowler v. UezzellIdaho Supreme Court · 1972
- Bailey v. EwingIdaho Court of Appeals · 1983
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Twin Forks Ranch, Inc. v. BrooksNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1995
- Leydet v. City of Mountain HomeIdaho Court of Appeals · 1991
- Paradise Restaurant, Inc. v. Somerset Enterprises, Inc.Supreme Court of Vermont · 1995
- Rancourt v. VerbaSupreme Court of Vermont · 1996
- Smith v. David S. Shurtleff & AssociatesIdaho Court of Appeals · 1993
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.