Legal Opinion

HDT Bio Corp v. Emcure Pharmaceuticals Ltd

District Court, W.D. Washington

Decided February 12, 2024No. 2:22-cv-00334Unknown

1Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON 8 AT SEATTLE 9 10 HDT BIO CORP., CASE NO. C22-0334JLR 11 Plaintiff, ORDER v. 12 EMCURE PHARMACEUTICALS, 13 LTD., 14 Defendant. 15 I. INTRODUCTION 16 Before the court is Defendant Emcure Pharmaceuticals, Ltd.’s (“Emcure”) motion 17 for attorneys’ fees under RCW 4.28.185(5). (Mot. (Dkt. # 199); Reply (Dkt. # 224).) 18 Plaintiff HDT Bio Corp. (“HDT”) opposes the motion. (Resp. (Dkt. # 221).) The court 19 // 20 // 21 // 22 1 has considered the parties’ submissions, the relevant portions of the record, and the 2 governing…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Walden v. FioreSupreme Court of the United States · 2014
  2. Scott Fetzer Co. v. WeeksWashington Supreme Court · 1990
  3. Fluke Capital & Management Services Co. v. RichmondWashington Supreme Court · 1986
  4. Hubbard v. SOBRECK, LLCCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2009
  5. West Consultants, Inc. v. DavisCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2013

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API