Legal Opinion

Baglio v. Director General of Railroads

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided December 1, 1922PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtPierce, J.

This is an action of tort to recover damages for the death of the plaintiff’s intestate on January 25, 1920. The case was submitted to the jury on the first count, which alleges in substance that the plaintiff is the administratrix of the estate of Angelo Gerace; that on or about January 25, 1920, the said intestate was employed as a laborer and trackman of the New York, New Haven and Hartford Railroad, then under federal control; that while at work on a track of that railroad in the course of his employment, and in the exercise of due care, he was run over by a negligently operated train of…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Carney v. Boston Elevated Railway Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1912
  2. Perkins v. Bay State Street Railway Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1916
  3. Gatchell v. Boston Elevated Railway Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1921
  4. Kinnarney v. Milford & Uxbridge Street Railway Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1922

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Reardon v. Boston Elevated Railway Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1923
  2. Whalen v. MutrieMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1924
  3. Coleman v. Boston Elevated Railway Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1924
  4. Nadeau v. Trustees of New York, New Haven & Hartford RailroadMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1942

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API