Legal Opinion

Nadeau v. Trustees of New York, New Haven & Hartford Railroad

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided January 28, 1942Published

1Opinion of the CourtQua, J.

On October 1,1937, the defendants, as “Trustees of the Property of the New York, New Haven & Hartford Railroad Company,” were in control of “Yard 5” and “Pier 4” at South Boston. “Yard 5” contained a large number of parallel tracks most of which ended at Northern Avenue. “Pier 4” was on the opposite side of Northern *718Avenue. The tracks in the yard were so spaced as to leave between them at intervals driveways twenty-five or more feet in width. The Weyerhaeuser Sales Company, which had an office on “Pier 4,” had made some arrangement with the defendants by which when lumber consigned to it was…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Aerkfetz v. HumphreysSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
  2. Dixon v. New York, New Haven, & Hartford RailroadMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1910
  3. Lizotte v. New York Central & Hudson River RailroadMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1907
  4. Dolphin v. New York, New Haven, & Hartford RailroadMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1903
  5. Meadowcroft v. New York, New Haven, & Hartford Railroad Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1906

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API