Legal Opinion

Carney v. Boston Elevated Railway Co.

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided May 25, 1912PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSheldon, J.

The plaintiff was injured while she was riding in an open surface car beneath the defendant’s elevated structure. She heard the rumble of an elevated train over her car, “saw the sparks flying,” looked up and was struck in the eye by a spark, which could be found to have been a minute piece of hot iron, about as large as the point of a pin, coming from the elevated road, and, as we assume, from the contact shoe of the train which wad passing thereon. The structure was properly in the street and the defendant was authorized to operate its road by electricity. There was no evidence that it was…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Gleeson v. Virginia Midland RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1891
  2. Searles v. . Manhattan Railway CompanyNew York Court of Appeals · 1886
  3. Graham v. BadgerMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1895
  4. Minihan v. Boston Elevated Railway Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1908
  5. Wadsworth v. Boston Elevated Railway Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1903

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. Kusick v. Thorndike & Hix, Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1916
  2. Guell v. TenneyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1928
  3. St. Louis v. Bay State Street Railway Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1913
  4. Gavin v. KlugeMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1931
  5. DiLeo v. Eastern Massachusetts Street Railway Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1926

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API