Legal Opinion
Alaska Public Utilities Commission v. Greater Anchorage Area Borough
Alaska Supreme Court
Decided April 4, 1975No. 2314PublishedCited by 29 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
BOOCHEVER, Justice.
This petition for review requires us to re-examine criteria to be applied by the superior court in ascertaining whether to overrule a decision of the Alaska Public Utility Commission (hereinafter the Commission) pertaining to interim relief sought by a public utility which had applied for authority to charge higher rates.
The Greater Anchorage Area Borough (hereinafter the Borough) assumed responsibility for the City of Anchorage sewer utility operation in 1970 after having received appropriate authorization from the voters of the Borough. The Borough points to three…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- Hamilton Watch Co. v. Benrus Watch Co., IncCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1953
- American Telephone & Telegraph Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1936
- Kelly v. ZamarelloAlaska Supreme Court · 1971
- Prendergast v. New York Telephone Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1923
- Ohio Oil Co. v. ConwaySupreme Court of the United States · 1929
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by29 opinions
- General Telephone Co. of the Northwest, Inc. v. Utilities & Transportation CommissionWashington Supreme Court · 1985
- Messerli v. Department of Natural ResourcesAlaska Supreme Court · 1989
- Far North Sanitation, Inc. v. Alaska Public Utilities CommissionAlaska Supreme Court · 1992
- State, Department of Fish & Game, Sport Fish Division v. MeyerAlaska Supreme Court · 1995
- United States v. RCA Alaska Communications, Inc.Alaska Supreme Court · 1979
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.