Cline v. American Aggregates Corp.
Ohio Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtJ. P. Celebrezze, J.
This court is today asked to reexamine the common law of Ohio as it is applied to ground water. The current standard recognizes no correlative rights with respect to ground water between adjoining landowners. This court last examined the issues encompassed in the present case in Frazier v. Brown (1861), 12 Ohio St. 294. In Frazier the “English rule” was applied to resolve any conflict involving percolating ground water.
This court stated in Frazier:
“* * * ‘[T]here are no correlative rights existing between the proprietors of adjoining lands, in reference to the use of the water in the earth,…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Katz v. WalkinshawCalifornia Supreme Court · 1903
- Meeker v. City of East OrangeSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1909
- Bassett v. Salisbury Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of New Hampshire · 1862
- Horne v. Utah Oil Refining Co.Utah Supreme Court · 1921
- Village of Tequesta v. Jupiter Inlet Corp.Supreme Court of Florida · 1979
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- The Edwards Aquifer Authority and the State of Texas v. Burrell Day and Joel McDanielTexas Supreme Court · 2012
- Spear T Ranch, Inc. v. KnaubNebraska Supreme Court · 2005
- Ketchel v. Bainbridge TownshipOhio Supreme Court · 1990
- Harry McNamara v. The City of RittmanCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2007
- McNamara v. City of RittmanOhio Supreme Court · 2005
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.