Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Wynn

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided September 12, 2000PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORIE MELVIN, J.:

¶ 1 Appellant, Phillip Wynn, appeals nunc pro tunc from the judgment of sentence entered in the Court of Common Pleas of Philadelphia County following his conviction of aggravated assault 1 , possession of an instrument of crime 2 , and criminal conspiracy 3 . Mr. Wynn challenges the constitutionality of the sentencing procedure set forth in 42 Pa.C.S.A. § 9714 (relating to sentences for second and subsequent offenses) as violative of his procedural due process rights under the Fourteenth Amendment of the federal constitution. He also contends his trial counsel was ineffective…

2Cases cited39 opinions

  1. Meachum v. FanoSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  2. Greenholtz v. Inmates of the Nebraska Penal & Correctional ComplexSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  3. Patterson v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
  4. McMillan v. PennsylvaniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  5. Speiser v. RandallSupreme Court of the United States · 1958

34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. FosterSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2011
  2. Commonwealth v. AponteSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2004
  3. Commonwealth v. ForbesSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2005
  4. Com. v. Cala Leliebre, N.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2015
  5. Com. v. Hughes, B.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2015

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API