Legal Opinion
United States v. Sherrett
District Court, D. Oregon
Decided February 8, 1995No. CR 92-298-JOPublishedCited by 24 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW
ROBERT E. JONES, Judge:
Defendants Thomas Sherrett, Thanh Hai Vominh, and Tan Vominh move to dismiss the indictment in this action on the grounds that it violates the Double Jeopardy Clause of the Fifth Amendment. The government moves for an order staying the proceedings pending final resolution of the $105,089 case or, if no stay is issued, it argues that defendants’ motion should be denied.
FINDINGS OF FACT
The following statement of the case has been drawn primarily from the government’s opposition memorandum, filed on January 18, 1995.
I. Civil…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Blockburger v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1931
- United States v. DixonSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Austin v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Grady v. CorbinSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
- United States v. FelixSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by24 opinions
- United States v. $184,505.01 in U.S. Currency Reginald D. McGlory Claimant-Appellant, United States of America v. $14,548.50 in U.S. Currency Reginald D. McGlory Claimant-Appellant, United States of America v. One Marble Indian Statue, One Replica Remington Rattlesnake Statue, Reginald D. McGlory Claimant-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1995
- People v. P.S.Illinois Supreme Court · 1996
- City of Lake Oswego v. $23,232.23 in CashCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1996
- Ludeman v. Department of HealthCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1997
- United States v. MuthDistrict Court, D. Oregon · 1995
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.