Legal Opinion
Ludeman v. Department of Health
Court of Appeals of Washington
Decided November 24, 1997No. 39475-4-IPublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtCox, J.
The Department of Health revoked Yong Rip Ludeman’s massage license and imposed a fine on her for violating the Uniform Disciplinary Act (UDA). The UDA governs the professional conduct of licensed massage practitioners. Because double jeopardy is not implicated under the facts of this case, collateral estoppel does not apply, and there was no violation of the prohibition against ex post facto laws, we affirm.
Yong Rip Ludeman was a massage practitioner licensed by the State of Washington. The Federal Way District Court found her guilty of prostitution in January 1991.
In March 1992, the State…
2Cases cited36 opinions
- Blockburger v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1931
- United States v. DixonSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- United States v. HalperSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- United States v. UrserySupreme Court of the United States · 1996
- State v. GunwallWashington Supreme Court · 1986
31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Brown v. Department of HealthCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1998
- Brown v. STATE DENTAL DISCIPLINARY BD.Court of Appeals of Washington · 1999
- Everett v. AbbeyCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2001
- Ludeman v. Department of HealthCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1997
- Ludeman v. State, Dept. of HealthCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1998