Legal Opinion
Venable v. General Motors Corp.
Michigan Court of Appeals
Decided October 22, 2002No. Docket No. 219037PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ON REMAND
Before: O’Connell, P.J., and Fitzgerald and Wilder, JJ. O’Connell, P.J.
This reverse employment discrimination case is before us on remand from our Supreme Court. In an unusual remand order, the Court stated in part:
*475The panel is directed to explain . . . whether, in affirming summary disposition in favor of defendant, it was necessary to rely on Allen v Comprehensive Health Services, 222 Mich App 426; 564 NW2d 914 (1997). If it was not, the Court should explain why not. If it was, the Court should explain why it was and address whether the [“]background circumstances!”] test imposed…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Texas v. BrownSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Spiek v. Department of TransportationMichigan Supreme Court · 1998
- Tom PIERCE, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. COMMONWEALTH LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY and Capital Holding Corporation, Defendants-AppelleesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1994
- Hazle v. Ford Motor Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 2001
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Raymond J Carey v. Foley & Lardner LLPMichigan Court of Appeals · 2016
- Venable v. General Motors Corp.Michigan Court of Appeals · 2003