Legal Opinion
Star Tribune v. City of St. Paul
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
Decided May 13, 2003No. C5-02-1931PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
RANDALL, Judge.
Respondent Star Tribune brought an action against the City of St. Paul under the Minnesota Government Data Practices Act, MinmStat. ch. 13 (2002), seeking access to information the St. Paul Police Department gathered regarding racial profiling in traffic stops from April to December 2000. While the City made a summary report public, the officer/squad identity information in the raw data was not disclosed based on the City’s conclusion that personal identity information was “personnel data” designated as private under Minn.Stat. § 13.43 (2002). Respondent initiated this…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Offerdahl v. University of Minnesota Hospitals & ClinicsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1988
- Lefto v. Hoggsbreath Enterprises, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1998
- Becker v. Alloy Hardfacing & Engineering Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1987
- Kugling v. WilliamsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1950
- Wallin v. LetourneauSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1995
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers, Local No. 292 v. City of St. CloudCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2008
- WDSI, INC. v. County of SteeleCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2003
- National Council on Teacher Quality v. Minnesota State Colleges & UniversitiesCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2013