Legal Opinion

Malone v. Burlington, Cedar Rapids & Northern Railway Co.

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided June 14, 1883PublishedCited by 10 opinions

Appeal from Linn District Court. Action to recover for a personal injury. There was a trial to a jury, and verdict and judgment were rendered for the plaintiff. The defendant appeals.

1Opinion of the CourtAdams, J.

— The plaintiff was employed to wipe defendant’s engines and to do some other work in and about the defendant’s round-house. One of his duties was to open the doors of the round-house and allow the engines to pass in and but, and to shut the doors afterward. These doors, it seems, were large, weighing several hundred pounds. At the time of the accident in question, the plaintiff and two other employes were endeavoring* to shut them. There had been an accumulation of snow and ice, which obstructed the doors and made it difficult to shut them. The plaintiff and his co-employes had succeeded in…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Deppe v. Chicago, R. I. & P. R. Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1872

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Chicago, Milwaukee & St. Paul Railway Co. v. ArterySupreme Court of the United States · 1890
  2. Jemming v. Great Northern Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1905
  3. Vermilya v. Chicago, Milwaukee & St. Paul R'y Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1885
  4. Akeson v. Chicago, Burlington & Quincy Railway Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1898
  5. Malone v. Burlington, Cedar Rapids & Northern Railway Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1884

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API