United States v. H. Wayne Hayes, Jr.
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
THOMAS, Circuit Judge:
In this appeal, H. Wayne Hayes asks us to reverse the judgment of the district court and to order the United States to reimburse him for restitution payments he made subject to a criminal judgment that was later vacated on collateral review. Under the circumstances presented by this case, we conclude that Hayes is not entitled to the relief that he seeks, and we affirm the judgment of the district court.
I
Hayes was charged with operating a Ponzi scheme 1 from December 1984 through April 1986 involving the sale to Hawaii residents of working interests in five Louisiana oil…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Faretta v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- United States v. James Leroy MartinsonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1987
- Telink, Inc. Burnup & Sims, Inc. v. United States of America, County of Fresno, County of San Diego, Intervenors-AppelleesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1994
- United States v. H. Wayne Hayes, Jr.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2000
- Alexander v. Compton (In re Bonham)Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2000
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- Nelson v. ColoradoSupreme Court of the United States · 2017
- Ordonez v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2012
- United States v. BrooksCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2017
- People v. NelsonColorado Court of Appeals · 2013
- People v. MaddenColorado Court of Appeals · 2013
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.