Legal Opinion

Nguyen v. City of Cleveland

District Court, N.D. Ohio

Decided November 21, 2000No. 1:99CV2990PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

ALDRICH, District Judge.

This action arises under 31 U.S.C. § 3730(h), the whistleblower provision of the False Claims Act (the “FCA”). This Court has jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1331. There are now three motions before this Court. First is the motion of one of the defendants, Parsons Engineering Sciences, Inc. (“Parsons”), to dismiss the action under Fed.R.Civ.P. 12(b)(6) for failure to state a claim upon which relief may be granted, or in the alternative, to stay the proceedings and to enforce the arbitration agreement between the plaintiff (“Nguyen”) and Parsons…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Gilmer v. Interstate/Johnson Lane Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1991
  2. Shearson/American Express Inc. v. McMahonSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  3. Tafflin v. LevittSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
  4. Gulf Offshore Co. v. Mobil Oil Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1981
  5. Tennessee v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1880

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. United States Ex Rel. Wilson v. Kellogg Brown & Root, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2008
  2. Seawright v. American General Financial Services, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2007
  3. United States Ex Rel. Head v. Kane Co.District Court, District of Columbia · 2011
  4. Mike Townsend v. Bayer HealthCareCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2014
  5. Orcutt v. Kettering Radiologists, Inc.District Court, S.D. Ohio · 2002

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API