Legal Opinion

State v. Woods

Court of Appeals of South Carolina

Decided January 24, 2000No. 3104PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

GOOLSBY, Judge:

Derrick Bernard Woods appeals his conviction for distribution of crack cocaine and distribution within proximity of a public park. Woods moved for a new trial based on information acquired after his conviction that a juror had not properly responded to voir dire questions. The trial court denied the motion. We reverse and remand.1

FACTS

When conducting a voir dire examination of the jury venire, the trial court identified each of the lawyers that would be involved in Woods’ trial and asked if anyone was a “friend[ ] or casual acquaintance [ ] with any of them or business…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. State v. KellySupreme Court of South Carolina · 1998
  2. Photostat Corporation and Lloyd Randall Ward, Jr. v. Harold E. BallCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1964
  3. State v. RobinsonSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1991
  4. State v. GulledgeSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1982
  5. Thompson Ex Rel. Estate of Thompson v. O'RourkeSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1986

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. State v. WoodsSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2001
  2. Long v. NORRIS & ASSOCIATES, LTD.Court of Appeals of South Carolina · 2000
  3. State v. MillerCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2012
  4. State v. WoodsSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2001
  5. State v. WoodsSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2001

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API