Legal Opinion

In Re Appraiser Foundation Antitrust Litigation

District Court, D. Minnesota

Decided May 31, 1994No. 4:93-md-00973PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER

DIANA E. MURPHY, Chief Judge.

Plaintiffs National Association of Review Appraisers and Mortgage Underwriters (NARA/MU) and National Association of Real Estate Appraisers (NAREA) 1 assert federal claims under the sections 1 and 2 of the Sherman Antitrust Act (15 U.S.C. §§ 1 and 2) and state common law claims for tortious interference with contract and prospective business relations against the defendants Appraisal Foundation (Foundation), its sponsors, and trustees. The court has jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. §§ 1337 and 1367. Defendants 2 have moved for summary…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Zenith Radio Corp. v. Hazeltine Research, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1971
  4. Copperweld Corp. v. Independence Tube Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
  5. Bigelow v. RKO Radio Pictures, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1946

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Freeman v. SAN DIEGO ASSN. OF REALTORSCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1999
  2. Guinness Import Co. v. Mark VII Distributors, Inc.District Court, D. Minnesota · 1997
  3. In re Circuit Breaker LitigationDistrict Court, C.D. California · 1997

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API