Legal Opinion

In re the Construction of the Will of Herz

New York Surrogate's Court

Decided January 6, 1953PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Frankenthai,er, S.

This proceeding was instituted by the executors of decedent’s estate to obtain a construction of her holographic will.

■ Testatrix provided that “ as yet all the Monroe Bosenau estate is not settled — Just as soon as it is — I want a trust fund established as I state below — I want a trust fund of sixty-five ($65,000) thousand dollars established Monroe Bosenau referred to above died October 16, 1948, but at the death of testatrix on January 4, 1951, his estate was still being adminis*1079tered. The court holds that the will creates a valid trust in the principal amount of $65,000…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Tillman v. . OgrenNew York Court of Appeals · 1920
  2. Thurber v. . ChambersNew York Court of Appeals · 1876
  3. Trask v. . SturgesNew York Court of Appeals · 1902
  4. In re the Estate of JamesNew York Surrogate's Court · 1943
  5. In re the Accounting of HundAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1943

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. In re the Construction of the Will of MattesNew York Surrogate's Court · 1954
  2. Johnson v. HallCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1978
  3. In Re Estate of TedfordSupreme Court of Iowa · 1966
  4. In re the Estate of CoulterNew York Surrogate's Court · 1957
  5. Matter of Estate of KingSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1979

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API