In re the Construction of the Will of Herz
New York Surrogate's Court
1Opinion of the Court
Frankenthai,er, S.
This proceeding was instituted by the executors of decedent’s estate to obtain a construction of her holographic will.
■ Testatrix provided that “ as yet all the Monroe Bosenau estate is not settled — Just as soon as it is — I want a trust fund established as I state below — I want a trust fund of sixty-five ($65,000) thousand dollars established Monroe Bosenau referred to above died October 16, 1948, but at the death of testatrix on January 4, 1951, his estate was still being adminis*1079tered. The court holds that the will creates a valid trust in the principal amount of $65,000…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Tillman v. . OgrenNew York Court of Appeals · 1920
- Thurber v. . ChambersNew York Court of Appeals · 1876
- Trask v. . SturgesNew York Court of Appeals · 1902
- In re the Estate of JamesNew York Surrogate's Court · 1943
- In re the Accounting of HundAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1943
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- In re the Construction of the Will of MattesNew York Surrogate's Court · 1954
- Johnson v. HallCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1978
- In Re Estate of TedfordSupreme Court of Iowa · 1966
- In re the Estate of CoulterNew York Surrogate's Court · 1957
- Matter of Estate of KingSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1979
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.