Legal Opinion

In re the Accounting of Hund

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided June 29, 1943PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Per curiam

Unquestionably the testator had a right, under section 124 of the Decedent Estate Law, to provide, in his will, for the payment of all inheritance taxes, by whatever name called, out of his residuary estate, instead of leaving them to become, by operation of law, a charge, pro rata, upon the several devises and legacies. The only question here involved is whether or not the testator clearly expressed an intention to make such taxes a charge upon his residuary estate. *380The will provided: ‘( I direct my executors to pay from funds of my estate all my just debts and funeral expenses, and also any…

2Cited by20 opinions

  1. Security First National Bank of Los Angeles v. WellslagerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1948
  2. In Re Barret's EstateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1962
  3. In re the Accounting of DullesNew York Surrogate's Court · 1950
  4. In Re Estate of MumbyCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1999
  5. Johnson v. HallCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1978

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API