Legal Opinion

In re the Estate of James

New York Surrogate's Court

Decided February 1, 1943PublishedCited by 26 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Foley, S.

The principal question in this accounting proceeding of the executor and trustee involves the construction of the will and specifically whether the testatrix directed in it that the Federal and New York State estate taxes should be paid out of the residuary estate or apportioned equitably against the shares of the beneficiaries pursuant to section 124 of the Decedent Estate Law. The Surrogate holds that no apportionment was intended and that on the contrary the testamentary plan called for the payment of such taxes out of the residuary estate. These conclusions as to intent are…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. In Re the Will of FowlesNew York Court of Appeals · 1918
  2. In Re the Judicial Settlement of the Accounts of PiffardNew York Court of Appeals · 1888

3Cited by26 opinions

  1. Succession of JonesLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1965
  2. In re the Construction of the Will of MattesNew York Surrogate's Court · 1954
  3. Security First National Bank of Los Angeles v. WellslagerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1948
  4. In re the Accounting of DullesNew York Surrogate's Court · 1950
  5. Johnson v. HallCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1978

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API