Legal Opinion

City of Arlington, Tex. v. Golddust Twins Realty Corp.

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

Decided December 21, 1994No. 93-01127PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

PATRICK E. HIGGINBOTHAM, Circuit Judge:

The City of Arlington, Texas appeals the district court’s judgment invalidating Arlington’s condemnation of a leasehold interest owned by the Resolution Trust Corporation and Golddust Twins Realty Corporation. We find that Arlington exercised its eminent domain power for a valid public purpose. That Arlington’s stated purpose for taking the property differed from its actual purpose is not a basis for invalidating this condemnation. Accordingly, we reverse and remand so that the district court may determine the compensation due the condemnees.

I

A

Arlington…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Housing Authority v. HigginbothamTexas Supreme Court · 1940
  2. Davis v. City of LubbockTexas Supreme Court · 1959
  3. Coastal States Gas Producing Company v. PateTexas Supreme Court · 1958
  4. Burch v. City of San AntonioTexas Supreme Court · 1975
  5. Borden v. Trespalacios Rice & Irrigation Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1905

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Whittington v. City of Austin, Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)2005
  2. Donovan v. TOWN OF EDGARTOWN, MASS.District Court, D. Massachusetts · 2008
  3. Carlos Tijerina v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 7th District (Amarillo)2006
  4. Cascott, L.L.C. v. City of Arlington, Texas Court of Appeals, 2nd District (Fort Worth)2009
  5. Cascott, L.L.C. v. City of Arlington, Texas Court of Appeals, 2nd District (Fort Worth)2009

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API