Legal Opinion

Coburn v. . Carstarphen

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided October 12, 1927PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtConnor, J.

Tbis action was beard upon a statement of facts agreed. They are as follows:

1. Plaintiff is tbe receiver of Martin County Savings and Trust Company, an insolvent corporation, wbicb prior to bis appointment as sucb receiver was engaged in tbe banking business at "Williamston, Martin County, N. C. He bas brought tbis action to recover of defendant tbe amount of bis indebtedness to said corporation, as evidenced by two promissory notes.

2. Defendant, prior to its insolvency, executed and delivered to said corporation bis two promissory notes, one in tbe sum of $300, and tbe other in tbe sum of…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Davis v. Industrial Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1894
  2. People v. Cal. Safe Deposit & Tr. Co.California Supreme Court · 1914
  3. Page Trust Co. v. Wachovia Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1924
  4. Hodgin v. Peoples' National BankSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1899
  5. Graham v. Proctorville WarehouseSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1925

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. In Re BrittonUnited States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. North Carolina · 1988
  2. Old Southern Life Insurance v. Bank of North Carolina, N.A.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1978
  3. Stegal v. Union Bank & Federal Trust Co.Supreme Court of Virginia · 1934
  4. Durham v. SMI Industries Corp.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1989
  5. Lumberton v. . Hood, CommissionerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1933

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API