Legal Opinion

Home Insurance v. Curtis

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided October 12, 1875PublishedCited by 22 opinions

Error to Saginaw Circuit.

1Opinion of the Court

Maestom, J:

This was an action of assumpsit, brought to recover upon a policy of insurance, issued to Aaron Linton and made payable, in case of loss, to defendant in error, as his interest in the property insured, as mortgagee thereof, should appear. Defendant pleaded the general issue.

It appeared on the trial that Linton made a written application to the company for this insurance, in which he stated, in answer to a special question, that the property sought to be insured was mortgaged to the amount'of five thousand dollars. This application was made a condition of the insurance, and a…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Peoria Marine & Fire Insurance v. PerkinsMichigan Supreme Court · 1868

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. Home Insurance v. GilmanIndiana Supreme Court · 1887
  2. Hahn v. National UnionMichigan Supreme Court · 1893
  3. Hillock v. Traders InsuranceMichigan Supreme Court · 1884
  4. Tomsecek v. Travelers' Insurance Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1902
  5. Dyche v. BostianMissouri Court of Appeals · 1950

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API