Legal Opinion
Fry v. Kaiser
Michigan Court of Appeals
Decided April 24, 1975No. Docket 19342PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtBashara, J.
This is an appeal from a summary judgment granted to defendants in, an action brought by plaintiff for a determination of who owns a channel and an abutting five-foot strip of land. The case is unusual because each party contends the other owns the property.
A description of the property and a chronology of events are necessary for the disposition of this action.
Plaintiff, one of the original developers and successor in interest, constructed a subdivision known as Point Rosa Subdivision and Point Rosa Subdivisions one-five in Harrison Township. This appeal only involves Point Rosa No. 1.…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Kirchen v. RemengaMichigan Supreme Court · 1939
- Hewett Grocery Co. v. Biddle Purchasing Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1939
- Moore v. WhiteMichigan Supreme Court · 1909
- Durfee v. GarveyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1889
- Hogan v. CowartSupreme Court of Georgia · 1936
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Morrow v. BoldtMichigan Court of Appeals · 1994
- Little v. HirschmanMichigan Supreme Court · 2004
- Nelson v. Roscommon County Road CommissionMichigan Court of Appeals · 1982
- Minerva Partners, Ltd v. First Passage, LLCMichigan Court of Appeals · 2007
- Xerox Corp. v. City of KalamazooMichigan Court of Appeals · 1977
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.