Legal Opinion

Hogan v. Cowart

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided March 13, 1936No. 10727PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Atkinson, Justice.

1. In this State, where an owner of two tracts of land, while using a servitude on both tracts such as an agricultural ditch through cultivated lands, executes a deed conveying in fee simple and unconditionally one tract, he thereby loses all power over that tract, and can not afterward convert the servitude which he had enjoyed into an easement over that tract, by conveyance of the other tract to a different grantee. Rogers v. Wilson, 171 Ga. 802 (3) (156 S. E. 817).

(а) If the doctrine of implied reservation of an easement of necessity by a grantor of land can be applied in…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Blaylock v. HackelSupreme Court of Georgia · 1927
  2. Becker v. DonalsonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1910
  3. Muscogee Manufacturing Co. v. Eagle & Phenix MillsSupreme Court of Georgia · 1906
  4. Rogers v. WilsonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1931
  5. Rome Gas-Light Co. v. MeyerhardtSupreme Court of Georgia · 1878

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Goble v. Louisville & Nashville RailroadSupreme Court of Georgia · 1938
  2. Hall v. BrowningSupreme Court of Georgia · 1943
  3. Miller v. SlaterSupreme Court of Georgia · 1936
  4. Hasty v. WilsonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1967
  5. Anneberg v. KurtzSupreme Court of Georgia · 1944

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API