James David Orosco v. State
Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
SHERRY RADACK, Chief Justice.
After the trial court denied his motion to suppress, appellant, James David Orosco, pleaded guilty to possession of marihuana in an amount of more than four ounces, but less than five pounds, 1 and possession of a firearm by a felon. 2 In accordance with a plea agreement with the State, the trial court assessed punishment at six months’ confinement on the marihuana charge and two years’ confinement on the possession-of-a-firearm-by-a-felon charge. In his sole issue on appeal, appellant contends the trial court erred in denying his motion to suppress.
BACKGROU…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Schneckloth v. BustamonteSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Payton v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Guzman v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1997
- United States v. MendenhallSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Brown v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- State v. John Berry Jackson, Texas Court of Appeals, 11th District (Eastland)2014
- State v. BrayNebraska Supreme Court · 2017
- Michael Joseph Tilghman v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)2019
- Anh Tran v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)2019
- Christopher Lee Brooks v. the State of Texas, Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2021
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.