Legal Opinion

Bendorf v. Commissioner of Public Safety

Court of Appeals of Minnesota

Decided April 18, 2006No. A05-1484PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

TOUSSAINT, Chief Judge.

Appellant Charles J. Bendorf challenges the district court’s order sustaining the revocation of his driver’s license on the ground that he is entitled to a rescission of the revocation. Because the remedy for scheduling the revocation hearing under a statutory provision subsequently declared unconstitutional is not a rescission but a stay of revocation, we affirm.

FACTS

Minn.Stat. § 169A.53, subd. 3(a) (2002), provided that a judicial-review hearing of a driver’s-license revocation “must be held at the earliest practicable date, and in any event no later than 60…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Morton Buildings, Inc. v. Commissioner of RevenueSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1992
  2. Fedziuk v. Commissioner of Public SafetySupreme Court of Minnesota · 2005
  3. Szczech v. Commissioner of Public SafetyCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1984
  4. Nordvick v. Commissioner of Public SafetyCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2000

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Bendorf v. Commissioner of Public SafetySupreme Court of Minnesota · 2007
  2. Riehm v. Commissioner of Public SafetyCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2008
  3. Bendorf v. Commissioner of Public SafetyCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2006

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API