Legal Opinion
Szczech v. Commissioner of Public Safety
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
Decided January 25, 1984No. C9-83-1372PublishedCited by 32 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
WOZNIAK, Judge.
David Szczech seeks judicial review of revocation of his driving privileges under Minn.Stat. § 169.123 (1982), the Implied Consent statute.
Mr. Szczech was arrested for violating Minn.Stat. § 169.121 (1982), the DWI statute, and refused to submit to testing on the advice of counsel.
The matter was set for hearing before a referee, pursuant to Hennepin County bench rules, on June 10, 1983, within the 60-day period. On Mr. Szczech’s demand, the hearing was reset before a judge, but after the 60-day period expired. Mr. Szczech’s motion to dismiss at that time was granted by…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- MacKey v. MontrymSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- State, Department of Public Safety v. JuncewskiSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1981
- Heddan v. DirkswagerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1983
- Wenger v. WengerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1937
- State Department of Highways v. NormandinSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1969
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by32 opinions
- Johnson v. Commissioner of Public SafetyCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1985
- Bendorf v. Commissioner of Public SafetySupreme Court of Minnesota · 2007
- Davis v. Commissioner of Public SafetyCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1994
- State v. MyersSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1987
- Brooks v. Commissioner of Public SafetyCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1998
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.