Legal Opinion

Haviland v. Chase

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided March 15, 1898PublishedCited by 6 opinions

Error to Livingston; Smith, J. Trespass vi et armis by Edith Haviland against Almon L. Chase, Chauncey M. Wellman, and Thomas Gordon, Jr. From a judgment for plaintiff, defendants bring error.

1Opinion of the CourtMontgomery, J.

The plaintiff brought suit for trespass to the person, and gave evidence tending to show that while she was living in a house in Iosco township,,Livingston county, where she had resided for some 11 years, with her husband, Charles J. Haviland, defendants forcibly removed her from the premises; that she was not at the time in good health; and she also offered testimony to show some other circumstances of aggravation.' The defendants attempted to justify under a writ of assistance in the hands of defendant Chase, who was at the time sheriff. This writ was issued in'a proceeding against Louis A.…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Scripps v. ReillyMichigan Supreme Court · 1878
  2. Ross v. LeggettMichigan Supreme Court · 1886
  3. Stilson v. GibbsMichigan Supreme Court · 1884
  4. Wilson v. BowenMichigan Supreme Court · 1887
  5. Ford v. CheeverMichigan Supreme Court · 1895

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Bowden v. VoorheisMichigan Supreme Court · 1904
  2. Hink v. ShermanMichigan Supreme Court · 1911
  3. Henderson v. AgonMichigan Supreme Court · 1907
  4. Fowler v. BracyMichigan Supreme Court · 1900
  5. Tebo v. HavlikMichigan Supreme Court · 1984

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API