Twentieth Century Associates, Inc. v. Waldman
City of New York Municipal Court
1Opinion of the CourtMatteo, J.
Pursuant to rule 112 of the Rules of Civil Practice the plaintiff moves for judgment on the pleadings or in the alternative to strike out the affirmative defense cóntained in defendant’s answer.
The facts are undisputed. It appears that prior to and on March 1, 1943, the defendant, a tenant, occupied space used for commercial purposes in premises 335 West 35th Street, New York City, and paid a monthly rental of $75. On "November 28, 1944, a renewal lease was entered into for this space which increased the monthly rental to $133.34 commencing February 1, 1945.
On February 1, 1945, the defendant…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Nebbia v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1934
- Home Building & Loan Assn. v. BlaisdellSupreme Court of the United States · 1934
- Barbier v. ConnollySupreme Court of the United States · 1884
- People Ex Rel. Durham Realty Corp. v. La FetraNew York Court of Appeals · 1921
- Edgar A. Levy Leasing Co. v. SiegelSupreme Court of the United States · 1922
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Kuperschmid v. Globe Brief Case Corp.Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1945
- Sohmer Factors Corp. v. 187-20 Tioga Drive Corp.New York Supreme Court · 1957
- 18 Realty Corp. v. PaleyCity of New York Municipal Court · 1945