American Engineering Co. v. E. H. Bardes Range & Foundry Co.
District Court, S.D. Ohio
1Opinion of the Court
NEVIN, District Judge.
This is a patent suit. Plaintiff, American Engineering Company, filed its bill of complaint on March 25, 1936. Subsequently, amendments to the bill were filed. Defendant filed its answer on September 29, 1936, but later, on October 6, 1936, with the consent of plaintiff, defendant filed a substituted answer.
The bill of complaint and amendments thereto, set forth a number of patents, to which plaintiff claimed ownership and all of which it claimed defendant was infringing. Prior to the trial of this cause (July 1 and 2, 1937) the parties hereto had agreed that a consent…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Knapp v. MorssSupreme Court of the United States · 1893
- Shepard v. CarriganSupreme Court of the United States · 1886
- Hubbell v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1900
- Leggett v. AverySupreme Court of the United States · 1880
- National Tube Co. v. MarkCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1914
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Mueller v. CampbellDistrict Court, S.D. Ohio · 1946
- American Engineering Co. v. Stoker Castings & Service, Inc.District Court, D. Massachusetts · 1944
- American Engineering Co. v. Stoker Castings & Service, Inc.District Court, D. Massachusetts · 1942