Legal Opinion
Hunter v. A-1 Bonding Service, Inc.
Court of Appeals of Georgia
Decided September 20, 1968No. 43613PublishedCited by 61 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Eberhardt, Judge.
Although the complaint was amended after the motion to dismiss was made and urged, the amendment contained nothing in the way of allegations different from those already in the complaint or changing the nature of the claim presented. It is thus immaterial that there was no renewal of the motion after the amendment.
It is somewhat difficult for us to adjust our thinking relative to the requirements as to pleadings under the Civil Practice Act, simply because of the deep impressions made by many years of experience under the Code pleading. But there is a difference, and we think…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Harper v. DeFreitasCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1968
- Reynolds v. ReynoldsSupreme Court of Georgia · 1961
- Byrd v. Ford Motor Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1968
- Savannah Electric Co. v. WheelerSupreme Court of Georgia · 1907
- Louisville & Nashville Railroad v. HudsonCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1911
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by61 opinions
- Summer-Minter & Associates, Inc. v. GiordanoSupreme Court of Georgia · 1973
- Harrison v. TuggleSupreme Court of Georgia · 1969
- Dillingham v. Doctors Clinic, P. A.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1976
- Montgomery v. Pacific & Southern Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1974
- A-1 Bonding Service, Inc. v. HunterCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1971
56 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.