Legal Opinion

In Re Swift Transportation Co.

Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)

Decided January 23, 2009No. 05-08-01377-CVPublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

Opinion by

Justice LANG-MIERS.

Relator Swift Transportation Company, Inc. seeks mandamus relief after the trial court denied its motion to compel arbitration. Because the Federal Arbitration Act (FAA) 1 requires the trial court to compel arbitration in this case, we conditionally grant the petition and order the trial court to compel arbitration in accordance with the parties’ agreement.

BACKGROUND

Swift is an interstate transportation company. On August 14, 2007, Swift and real party in interest Carlus McDougle entered into a Contractor Agreement, in which McDougle agreed to transport…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. At&T Technologies, Inc. v. Communications WorkersSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. In Re Firstmerit Bank, N.A.Texas Supreme Court · 2001
  3. In Re Kellogg Brown & Root, Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 2005
  4. Balandran v. Safeco Insurance Co. of AmericaTexas Supreme Court · 1998
  5. L & L Kempwood Associates, L.P. v. Omega Builders, Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 1999

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Atlas IDF v. NexPoint Real Estate PartnersTexas Business Court · 2025
  2. in Re: Rio Grande Xarin II, Ltd., Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District2010
  3. in Re: Rio Grande Xarin II, Ltd., Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District2010

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API