Claim of Hosmer v. Emerson Power Transmission
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Opinion of the CourtRose, J.
Appeal from a decision of the Workers’ Compensation Board, filed June 7, 2001, which ruled, inter alia, that claimant sustained a causally related occupational disease.
*871In 1972, claimant began working for the employer hand-assembling industrial chain to be used in machinery. Her duties entailed handling the links and pins, which had been coated with a black powdery lubricant known as molykote, and manually putting the pieces together. In 1998, claimant began experiencing respiratory problems and sought medical treatment. She eventually stopped working on June 9, 1999, having developed severe…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Claim of Tompkins v. Sunrise Heating Fuels, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2000
- Marks v. County of TompkinsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2000
- Claim of Altes v. Petrocelli Electric Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2001
- Claim of Cocco v. New York City Department of TransportationAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1999
- Claim of Garrio v. DonovanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2002
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Claim of Floyd v. Millard Fillmore HospitalAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2002
- Claim of Harrington v. L.C. Whitford Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2003
- Claim of Owoc v. Syracuse UniversityAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2003
- Fredenburg v. Emerson Power TransmissionAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2003
- Matter of Waddy v. Barnard CollegeAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2016
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.