Legal Opinion

Anderson v. Baehr

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided July 21, 1975No. 20068PublishedCited by 25 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Moss, Chief Justice:

This action is one under the Uniform Declaratory Judgments Act, § 10-2001 et seq., 1962 Code of Laws, commenced by the plaintiff, who is a resident and taxpayer in the city of Spartanburg, individually and in a representative capacity representing all other persons similarly situated. The defendants are the mayor and councilmen of the city of Spartanburg, and Daniel R. McLeod as Attorney General of the State of South Carolina.

The complaint, contesting the constitutionality of Act No. 1097 (referred to as Ratification No. R 1252) of the General Assembly of 1974, reads as…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Elliott v. McNairSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1967
  2. McNulty v. Owens, MayorSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1938
  3. Edens v. City of ColumbiaSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1956
  4. Harper v. SchoolerSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1972

3Cited by25 opinions

  1. Bauer v. South Carolina State Housing AuthoritySupreme Court of South Carolina · 1978
  2. WDW PROPERTIES v. City of SumterSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2000
  3. State Ex Rel. McLeod v. RileySupreme Court of South Carolina · 1981
  4. State Ex Rel. Medlock v. South Carolina State Family Farm Development AuthoritySupreme Court of South Carolina · 1983
  5. Charleston County Aviation Authority v. WassonSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1982

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API