Legal Opinion · Concurrence

Delaware Coalition for Open Government, Inc. v. Strine

Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit

Decided October 23, 2013No. 18-1868Published

1ConcurrenceFuentes, Circuit Judge

Today we affirm the District Court’s ruling, which concluded that “the right of access applies to the Delaware proceeding created by section 349 of the Delaware Code.” Del. Coal, for Open Gov’t v. Strine, 894 F.Supp.2d 493, 504 (D.Del.2012). Specifically, the District Court held that “the portions of [section 349] and [of] Chancery Court Rules 96, 97, and 98, which make the proceeding confidential, violate that right.” Id. I agree. I write separately because, given that not all provisions of § 349 of the Delaware Code or the Chancery Court Rules relating to Judge-run arbitration proceedings…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Champlin Rfg. Co. v. Corporation Commission of OklahomaSupreme Court of the United States · 1932
  2. Regan v. Time, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
  3. Alaska Airlines, Inc. v. BrockSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  4. Ayotte v. Planned Parenthood of Northern New Eng.Supreme Court of the United States · 2006
  5. Delaware Coalition for Open Government v. StrineDistrict Court, D. Delaware · 2012

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API