Neal v. HONEYWELL INC.
District Court, N.D. Illinois
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
PLUNKETT, District Judge.
Before us is a prolix stack of post-trial motions filed by both the plaintiff, Ms. Neal, and the defendant, Honeywell. The three-week trial which preceded them told the disturbing story of a munitions manufacturer (the Joliet Arsenal, a division of Honeywell) during the mid-1980’s. Honeywell, unlike the arms maker who created a peace prize or who contributed profits to the poor, 1 manufactured defective shells, falsified its own test results, and repeatedly shipped faulty ammunition to the U.S. Army (a real life reenactment of the play All…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Alyeska Pipeline Service Co. v. Wilderness SocietySupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Trans World Airlines, Inc. v. ThurstonSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Blanchard v. BergeronSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Marcia L. Saxton v. American Telephone and Telegraph Company, Successor to at & T Bell LaboratoriesCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1993
- Alfonso Avitia, and Diane Larsen v. Metropolitan Club of Chicago, Incorporated, Cross-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1995
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Marilynn K. Hammond, M.D. v. Northland Counseling Center, Inc. Greg WalkerCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2000
- Judith A. Neal v. Honeywell Inc. And Alliant Techsystems Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1999
- Harris v. Blue Ridge Health Servs., Inc.District Court, M.D. North Carolina · 2019
- Wilkins v. St. Louis Housing AuthorityDistrict Court, E.D. Missouri · 2001
- Montgomery v. Aetna Plywood, Inc.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 1998
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.