Legal Opinion

Trickey v. Superior Court of Sacramento Cty.

California Court of Appeal

Decided July 17, 1967No. Civ. 11573PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtFriedman, J.

This mandate proceeding is the outgrowth of a personal injury action pending in the Superior Court of Sacramento County. Petitioners are the defendants. Real party in interest is the plaintiff Charles F. Williams. Under the provisions of Code of Civil Procedure section 598 the defense moved in the trial court for a bifurcated trial at which the issue of liability would be heard and decided before trial of the damage question. The court denied the motion, specifically on the ground that section 598 deprived it of power to make such an order after the close of the pretrial conference.…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Robinson v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1950
  2. Helbush v. HelbushCalifornia Supreme Court · 1930
  3. Cantillon v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1957
  4. Universal Underwriters Insurance v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1967
  5. People v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1965

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Horton v. JonesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1972
  2. Mason v. DunnAppellate Court of Illinois · 1972
  3. Oats v. OatsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1983
  4. Cohn v. BugasCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1974
  5. Lea v. ShankCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1970

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API