Legal Opinion

Kish v. Pennsylvania Railroad Co.

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided October 10, 1932No. Appeal, 233PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Mr. Justice Maxey,

This is an appeal from the refusal of the court below to enter judgment for the defendant non obstante vere-dicto. Plaintiff recovered a verdict in the sum of f 15,500 in an action arising out of the killing of her husband, aged 28 years, by a freight train at 11:20 p. m., April 14, 1928, at Duquesne. At the station in that city defendant has five parallel tracks running north and south. Across these tracks is a plank walk nine or ten feet in width which the evidence shows was used by the public. On the night of the accident, defendant, according to plaintiff’s…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Guilinger v. Pennsylvania R. R. Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1931
  2. Dalyanakis v. Aliquippa & Southern R. R.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1919

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Hostetler v. KniseleySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1936
  2. Tua v. Brentwood Motor Coach CompanySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1952
  3. Cunningham v. SpanglerSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1936
  4. Blair, (To Use) v. AdamchickSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1941
  5. Bert v. WalkerSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1941

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API