Elliott v. Ferguson
Texas Supreme Court
Error to the Court of Civil Appeals for the Third District, in an appeal from Dallas County. Ferguson and others sued Elliott and others for injunction, and had judgment making same perpetual. Defendants appealed, and the judgment was affirmed, whereupon they obtained writ of error.
1Opinion of the Court
WILLIAMS, Associate Justice.
In this case no statement of facts was prepared in accordance with the provisions of the Revised Statutes, but the plaintiffs in error caused a copy of the report of the testimony taken by the official stenographer to be made out, approved by the trial judge, and filed in accordance with the provisions of the Act of 1905. (Acts 29th Leg., p. 219.) The stenographer who made the notes of the testimony during the trial was the one acting under the Act of 1903 (Acts 28th Leg., p. 84), when that of 1905 took effect. The latter act became effective before the time had…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Oriental Investment Co. v. BarclayTexas Supreme Court · 1900
3Cited by6 opinions
- Walker v. LylesCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1931
- Missouri, Kansas & Texas Railway Co. v. WaggonerTexas Supreme Court · 1909
- Pellum v. FlemingCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1926
- Evans v. Galbraith-Foxworth Lumber Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1931
- Water & Light Co. of El Campo v. El Campo Light, Ice & Water Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1912
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.