Legal Opinion

Missouri, Kansas & Texas Railway Co. v. Waggoner

Texas Supreme Court

Decided January 27, 1909No. 1891PublishedCited by 11 opinions

Error to the Court of' Civil Appeals for the Fifth District, in an appeal from Grayson County. Waggoner sued and' recovered against the railway company, and defendant, the judgment being affirmed on its appeal, obtained writ of error.

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Williams

The Court of Civil Appeals, on motion of defendant in error, struck' out the statement of facts in this case for the reason that it did not conform to the Act of 1907 (Laws 30th Leg., p. 509), in that it was only a copy of the stenographer’s report of the evidence made up and certified in accordance with the Act of 1905 (Laws 29th Leg., p. 220), and did not appear to have been filed by the district clerk. The appeal was perfected on May 25, 1907, and the Act .of that year took effect August 11 thereafter. The stenographer’s transcript was agreed to by the parties and approved by the trial…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Hargrave v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1908
  2. Elliott v. FergusonTexas Supreme Court · 1907

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Walker v. LylesCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1931
  2. Kruegel v. CobbCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1910
  3. Brillhart v. BeeverCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1917
  4. Commercial Standard Ins. Co. v. NoackCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1931
  5. International & G. N. Ry. Co. v. ReekCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1915

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API