Legal Opinion

Hyde v. Ewert

South Dakota Supreme Court

Decided August 4, 1902PublishedCited by 12 opinions

' Appeal from circuit court, Hughes county. Hon. Loring E. Gappy, Judge. Action by Charles L. Hyde against Adolph Ewert, mayor of the city of Pierre, and others. Judgment for defendants, and plaintiff appeals.

1Opinion of the CourtHaney, P. J.

This is an action to enjoin the issuing of certain refunding bonds. The plaintiff appeals from a judgment of dismissal oh the merits. To avoid any misunderstanding regarding the facts upon which our conclusions are based, the findings of the learned circuit court, to which no objections are made, will be reproduced in extenso. Such findings are as follows:

“(1) That the plaintiff: is a citizen of the United States and of the state of South Dakota, and a resident, freeholder, taxpayer, and elector of the city of Pierre, county of Hughes, and state of South Dakota, and has been such for more…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. National Life Insurance v. MeadSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1900
  2. Rogan v. City of WatertownWisconsin Supreme Court · 1872
  3. City of Mitchell v. SmithSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1899
  4. Wilson v. Board of EducationSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1900
  5. Ransom v. MeadSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1900

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Vallelly v. Board of Park CommissionersNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1907
  2. Talkington v. TurnbowSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1935
  3. Sebern v. CobbIdaho Supreme Court · 1925
  4. Baldwin v. Board of EducationNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1948
  5. Gross v. City of BowdleSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1921

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API