Legal Opinion

Talkington v. Turnbow

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided June 10, 1935No. 4-3970PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHumphreys, J.

This suit was brought by appellant, the owner of real property and a citizen and taxpayer of Pope County, against appellees, the county judge and county treasurer, respectively, of said county, in the chancery court to enjoin them from refunding or extending the maturities of the funding bonds of said county theretofore issued under Amendment No. 10 to the Constitution of the State of Arkansas. It is admitted that the bonds about to be refunded were issued by Pope County pursuant to and in accordance with Amendment No. 10 to the Constitution of the State and the Enabling-Act No. 210 of the…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. National Life Insurance v. MeadSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1900
  2. City of Galena v. CorwithIllinois Supreme Court · 1868
  3. City of Quincy v. WarfieldIllinois Supreme Court · 1861
  4. Hyde v. EwertSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1902
  5. Rogan v. City of WatertownWisconsin Supreme Court · 1872

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Jones v. CheneySupreme Court of Arkansas · 1973
  2. Beaumont v. FaubusSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1965
  3. Arkansas Dep't of Human Services v. WaltersSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1993
  4. Pyle v. WebbSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1973
  5. Arkansas Bond Company v. HartonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1935

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API