Legal Opinion

Clarence W. King v. Eric K. Shinseki

United States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims

Decided March 21, 2014No. 12-1812PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

GREENBERG, Judge:

The appellant, Clarence W. ■ King, appeals through counsel a February 27, 2012, decision of the Board of Veterans’ Appeals (Board) that denied entitlement to non-service-connected pension benefits. Record (R.) at 3-8. The Court has jurisdiction to review the Board’s decision pursuant to 38 U.S.C. § 7252(a). For the following reason, the Court will reverse the Board’s February 2012 decision and remand the matter for the Board to reinstate the appellant’s nonservice-connected pension effective February 1, 2008.

I. Factual Background

The appellant served on active duty in the U.S.…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. Auer v. RobbinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
  2. Food & Drug Administration v. Brown & Williamson Tobacco Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 2000
  3. Davis v. Michigan Department of the TreasurySupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  4. Brown v. GardnerSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
  5. Corley v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2009

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Antonio Pacheco v. Sloan D. GibsonUnited States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · 2014
  2. Michael A. Hudgens v. Sloan D. GibsonUnited States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · 2014
  3. Antonio Pacheco v. Sloan D. GibsonUnited States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · 2014
  4. Eddie D. Ray v. Robert L. WilkieUnited States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · 2019
  5. Florence Kennedy v. Robert L. WilkieUnited States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · 2020

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API