Legal Opinion

People ex rel. Attorney-General v. Folsom

California Supreme Court

Decided July 1, 1855PublishedCited by 12 opinions

Appeal from the District Court of the Fourth Judicial District, San Francisco County. The facts material to the points decided appear in the opinion of the Court.

1Opinion of the CourtMurray, C. J.

Heydenfeldt, J., concurred.

This case has excited more public attention than any that, has heretofore been presented to this Court, both on account of the amount and the principles involved.

Its discussion has evinced a research and ability highly complimentary to the counsel engaged, without which it would have been almost impossible to arrive at a satisfactory conclusion.

The case stands thus: On the 18th of May 1848, Leidesdorff, a naturalized citizen of Mexico, died seized of the property in dispute, and that Anna Maria Sparks, his mother and heir, through whom defendant’s claim, was not at…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Craig v. LeslieSupreme Court of the United States · 1818
  2. Heirs of Holliman v. PeeblesTexas Supreme Court · 1846
  3. State v. RackleyIndiana Supreme Court · 1829
  4. Bradstreet v. Supervisors of OneidaNew York Supreme Court · 1835
  5. Mitchell v. DenboIndiana Supreme Court · 1833

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Mannheim v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1970
  2. United States v. KnutzenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1948
  3. de Racouillat v. SansevainCalifornia Supreme Court · 1867
  4. De Merle v. MathewsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1864
  5. State v. Savings Union Bank Etc. Co.California Supreme Court · 1921

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API