Legal Opinion

People v. Jasper

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided February 20, 2001No. 99SC987PublishedCited by 24 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Bender

I. INTRODUCTION

In this appeal we hold that a trial court possesses the inherent authority to impose a plea cutoff deadline as part of its case management responsibilities provided the parties have notice of the deadline. If the parties seek to tender the plea after the deadline, then they have the burden to establish good cause to bypass the deadline. Here, they have failed to do so. The determination of good cause in this context rests with the sound discretion of the trial court.

In this case, the prosecution, the petitioner before us, reached a plea agreement with the respondent, defendant…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Santobello v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  2. Mabry v. JohnsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  3. United States v. Robert Louis Ammidown, United States of America v. Robert L. AmmidownCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1974
  4. United States v. RobertsonCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1995
  5. United States v. Robert James MillerCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1983

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. People v. SchneiderSupreme Court of Colorado · 2001
  2. In Re Attorney CSupreme Court of Colorado · 2002
  3. People v. DarlingtonSupreme Court of Colorado · 2005
  4. State v. HagerSupreme Court of Iowa · 2001
  5. People v. HendersonIllinois Supreme Court · 2004

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API