Legal Opinion
Cassandra R. Wiltz, et al. v. Dave Yost, et al.
District Court, S.D. Ohio
Decided March 18, 2026No. 2:24-cv-04000Unknown
1Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO EASTERN DIVISION CASSANDRA R. WILTZ, et al., Plaintiffs, Case No. 2:24-cv-4000 v. JUDGE DOUGLAS R. COLE DAVE YOST, et al., Magistrate Judge Vascura Defendants. OPINION AND ORDER Plaintiff Cassandra Wiltz, a prolific pro se litigant, brought this lawsuit alleging that the forty-four named Defendants harmed her in myriad ways. (See generally Compl., Doc. 1). In a June 16, 2025, Opinion and Order, the Court granted most of the Defendants’ motions for judgment on the pleadings and motions to dismiss, and warned Wiltz that any attempt to…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Chambers v. Nasco, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1991
- United States v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 2008
- Stephen Michael Ridder v. City of Springfield, Clark CountyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1997
- Florida Department of Revenue v. Piccadilly Cafeterias, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2008
- Immigration & Naturalization Service v. National Center for Immigrants' Rights, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1991
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.