Legal Opinion
Thanh Thuy Vo v. City of Garden Grove
California Court of Appeal
Decided January 29, 2004No. G032058PublishedCited by 25 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
IKOLA, J.
The City of Garden Grove (city) enacted an ordinance (1) requiring “CyberCafes” to obtain a conditional use permit (CUP) to continue *430in business, and (2) regulating their operations.1 Several CyberCafe owners (plaintiffs) sought a preliminary injunction, contending portions of the ordinance infringed free speech and privacy rights protected by the First Amendment of the United States Constitution and article I, sections 1 and 2 of the California Constitution. The court preliminarily enjoined the city from enforcing portions of the CyberCafe ordinance, and the city appeals. We…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Ward v. Rock Against RacismSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Clark v. Community for Creative Non-ViolenceSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Smith v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1960
- City of Lakewood v. Plain Dealer Publishing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1988
- Sable Communications of California, Inc. v. Federal Communications CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by25 opinions
- Marken v. Santa Monica-Malibu Unified School DistrictCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2012
- Alliant Insurance Services, Inc. v. GaddyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2008
- Strategix, Ltd. v. Infocrossing West, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2006
- In Re JhCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2007
- Nexus v. SwiftCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2010
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.