Legal Opinion

Mega Outdoor, L.L.C. v. City of Dayton

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided October 19, 2007No. 21807PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Wolff, Presiding Judge.

{¶ 1} Mega Outdoor, L.L.C. (“Mega”) and the owners of 504 East First Street, William Smith and Dale Magistrelli, appeal from a judgment of the Montgomery Court of Common Pleas, which granted summary judgment to the city of Dayton on the grounds that their claims were precluded by res judicata and sovereign immunity.

{¶ 2} The record, construed in favor of Mega, Smith, and Magistrelli, establishes the following underlying facts.

{¶ 3} Mega entered into a lease agreement with Smith, and Magistrelli, which granted Mega permission to erect a free-standing poster sign…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Washington v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  2. Grava v. Parkman TownshipOhio Supreme Court · 1995
  3. Clements v. FashingSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  4. Grava v. Parkman Twp.Ohio Supreme Court · 1995
  5. Fabrey v. McDonald Village Police DepartmentOhio Supreme Court · 1994

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Bradley v. Dept. of Rehab. Correction, 07ap-506 (12-31-2007)Ohio Court of Appeals · 2007
  2. Cincinnati v. HarrisonOhio Court of Appeals · 2014
  3. Blust v. City of Blue AshOhio Court of Appeals · 2008
  4. Dover Chem. Corp. v. DoverOhio Court of Appeals · 2025
  5. Woodstock Solar Project, L.L.C. v. Rush Twp. Bd. of Zoning AppealsOhio Court of Appeals · 2025

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API